W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Outstanding Action Items

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:57:04 +1100
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1A110E52-FCCE-44D6-8CB3-FC0A1D6FA24C@mnot.net>
To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
Thanks. I've opened this to track:
  https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/19

On 06/02/2013, at 2:44 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote:

> <snip>
> 
>> * Will: double check that spdy's change to directionality for max streams has made it into http/2, or raise issue.
> 
> """
> 
> 4 - SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS allows the sender to inform
>         the remote endpoint the maximum number of concurrent streams
>         which it will allow.  By default there is no limit.  For
>         implementors it is recommended that this value be no smaller
>         than 100.
> """
> 
> It's the same text as we've had in SPDY/2, and our SPDY/4 draft is the
> same. This wording is technically correct, but it does not
> particularly emphasize that the limit is directional. I can imagine
> first time readers misinterpreting it.
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 01:57:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 18 February 2013 01:57:34 GMT