W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:51:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNe5VW7v2_qFs_FTHcfvZYFjd_7UV0Z3WzuvDOgGCsrNGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@ngtech.co.il>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Yup. It is pretty important :)
-=R


On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote:

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> --------
> In message <
> CAOdDvNrrDhyayThYJz+94C+U+K18gtvEGWqwZ-8-+wP6kH5QRw@mail.gmail.com>,
> Patrick McManus writes:
>
> >and we can apply a requirement to order things :scheme, :host, :uri in
> >order to facilitate streaming ..
>
> And then we're back to my underlying question:
>
> Isn't that the sort of thing we should settle before people spend a lot of
> time on simulating compression and encoding schemes, as this will clearly
> have significant impact on the results of those experiments ?
>
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 23:51:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 23:51:36 GMT