W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?

From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:31:54 +0900
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrrDhyayThYJz+94C+U+K18gtvEGWqwZ-8-+wP6kH5QRw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@ngtech.co.il>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'll point out that it is extremely rare for the whole URL to match a
> prior URL, and it is extremely common for the scheme and the host to remain
> constant across a large number of queries.
> +1

> Sending the components of the URI separately reduces the need to parse
> these things, and better, since most of the time the host won't have
> changed, a simple single 'if' allows us to proceed with the fqdn of the
> previous request without any parsing at all.
and we can apply a requirement to order things :scheme, :host, :uri in
order to facilitate streaming ..
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 23:32:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:09 UTC