On 16/01/2013, at 10:37 AM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >> We're talking about HTTP/1.x here, not 2.0. We can't retroactively make implementations non-conformant. > > Ah, yes. But we could stop encouraging implementors to merge multiple > header instances. Then we only have to say that it happens and > explain the pitfalls. It's extremely common to do something like: Cache-Control: max-age=60, must-revalidate Are you really saying that this should be discouraged? -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 23:48:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 January 2013 23:48:06 GMT