On 2013-01-15 16:38, Piotr Dobrogost wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> Note: current text in editor's copy is: >> >> "A sender MUST NOT generate multiple header fields with the same field name >> in a message unless either the entire field value for that header field is >> defined as a comma-separated list [i.e., #(values)] or the header field is a >> well-known exception (as noted below)." -- >> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-latest.html#rfc.section.3.2.2> > > Is the change compared to > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-21#section-3.2 > was made due to discussion in this thread? AS far as I can tell, it was made due to earlier feedback (not that it matters, though). The important point being that *senders* MUST NOT generate multiple header fields with the same name unless the syntax of the header field allows it. Best regards, JulianReceived on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 15:56:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 January 2013 15:56:46 GMT