W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: p1: Upgrade ordering (possible HTTP/2 impact)

From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 08:29:59 +0300
Message-ID: <5189E2D7.3070602@ericsson.com>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 4/20/13 7:07 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> p1 section 6.7 defines the Upgrade header, but no where does it say anything about relative preference.
>
> Should we define (or at least allow) for the ordering to be semantically significant? It seems to me that if we end up using this, and there are a few different variants of HTTP/2 (e.g., "normal" vs "mobile"), it'd be nice to rely on ordering here.
Mark
do you foresee the possibility HTTP/2 will be (or behave) differently 
or  it is just an example?

/Sal
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 05:30:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:13 UTC