W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 06:34:36 +0000
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
cc: (wrong string) ™ˆ™˜Œ) <willchan@chromium.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7499.1367994876@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CABP7Rbe+N+JEesvsV4EeQnc-7YSyiUmp2_46cD7znAA9OcNTZQ@mail.gmail.com>
, James M Snell writes:

>Proposal: Let's define that 8192+8 is the default MAX_FRAME size. 

8192 is a pretty arbitrary choice, wouldn't it make sense to do a
bit of math on typical MTU's and TCP/IP header sizes and see if
any numbers work out more optimal ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 06:34:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:13 UTC