- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:21:27 +0000
- To: patrick mcmanus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
- cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
In message <5016A3C5.2030708@mozilla.com>, patrick mcmanus writes: >I mean that HTTP/2 must be secure against (at least) passive >eavesdropping attacks at all times. Pardon me for being a bit blunt: You and what army ? I can understand if you insist that _your_ website can always be protected if you desire that. But I utterly fail to see what mandate you have to insist that some random 3rd party must protect their website at all times, countrary to their own wishes, and in particular when they may be legally prevented from doing so by applicable regulations. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 30 July 2012 15:21:50 UTC