W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: SPDY Header Frames

From: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:10:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CABaLYCsqLKV4WjOn4AZh3Cd3XErMGyK6an0gf-jitiM0Pf0HJw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote:

> In message <20120713225104.GK16256@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes:
> >Whatever will be retained as a basis for HTTP/2.0, this exercise is
> >useful and may incite other users to provide very valuable feedback.
> I think it is premature, because it obscures and prevents the much
> needed high-level design of HTTP/2.0.
> And that is exactly why I think the current approach and timeline
> is a road to nowhere fast.

> The fact that we just saw Google say they would get behind any
> improvement, as long as it is SPDY pretty much dooms the HTTP/2.0

For the record, Google did not say that.

Such negative biases really don't help the discussion.


> effort right there and then:  All that's on the table is minor
> rearrangements of the deckchairs, there is no opening for
> changing the course.
> And with that, over and out.

> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 23:10:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 13 July 2012 23:10:54 GMT