W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: SPDY Header Frames

From: Jonathan Ballard <dzonatas@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:27:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAPAK-7LOv_k1dmFeb+h9GYRsvb2qNvCdS37NA5-SA9S+GbWPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
I remembered when you called someone "bot".

No, it did not help at all. We need not enumerate reactions.

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote:
>
>> In message <20120713225104.GK16256@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes:
>>
>> >Whatever will be retained as a basis for HTTP/2.0, this exercise is
>> >useful and may incite other users to provide very valuable feedback.
>>
>> I think it is premature, because it obscures and prevents the much
>> needed high-level design of HTTP/2.0.
>>
>> And that is exactly why I think the current approach and timeline
>> is a road to nowhere fast.
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> The fact that we just saw Google say they would get behind any
>> improvement, as long as it is SPDY pretty much dooms the HTTP/2.0
>>
>
>
> For the record, Google did not say that.
>
> Such negative biases really don't help the discussion.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>> effort right there and then:  All that's on the table is minor
>> rearrangements of the deckchairs, there is no opening for
>> changing the course.
>>
>> And with that, over and out.
>>
>>
>
>
>> --
>> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
>> incompetence.
>>
>>
>
Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 23:27:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 13 July 2012 23:27:37 GMT