W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: SPDY Header Frames

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 23:01:15 +0000
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <46923.1342220475@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <20120713225104.GK16256@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes:

>Whatever will be retained as a basis for HTTP/2.0, this exercise is
>useful and may incite other users to provide very valuable feedback.

I think it is premature, because it obscures and prevents the much
needed high-level design of HTTP/2.0.

And that is exactly why I think the current approach and timeline
is a road to nowhere fast.

The fact that we just saw Google say they would get behind any
improvement, as long as it is SPDY pretty much dooms the HTTP/2.0
effort right there and then:  All that's on the table is minor
rearrangements of the deckchairs, there is no opening for
changing the course.

And with that, over and out.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 23:01:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 13 July 2012 23:01:43 GMT