W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate

From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:44:19 -0400
Message-Id: <477323D6-47EB-4DB9-8F67-A929314702CA@opera.com>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>

Le 29 mars 2012 à 08:22, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
> We could then get to a point where :
>  - an http:// scheme indicates a connection to HTTP/1.x or 2.x server
>  - an https:// scheme indicates a connection to HTTP/1.x or 2.x server
>    via an SSL/TLS layer
>  - a spdy:// scheme indicates a connection to HTTP/1.x or 2.x server
>    via a SPDY layer


Usually with 

    <img src="//example.org/foo.png" alt=""/>

you can create content which is easily interact with http and https 
without headaches (except for IE I think). It creates a nicer transition 
path from http to https.

I wonder if this would work with SPDY too.

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/
Developer Relations, Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 12:45:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:57 GMT