W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate

From: Salam J <salam.jiz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:53:39 +0430
Message-ID: <CAKuqADo7-gNLNrY2kUaUczmmFZLz3111HRLYMC+KUMVteRJGyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote:
>
> Usually with
>
>    <img src="//example.org/foo.png" alt=""/>
>
> you can create content which is easily interact with http and https
> without headaches (except for IE I think). It creates a nicer transition
> path from http to https.
>
> It is supported in IE with some *headaches* when used in HTTPS; see
http://paulirish.com/2010/the-protocol-relative-url/

I wonder if this would work with SPDY too.
>
> --
> Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/
> Developer Relations, Opera Software
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 19:24:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:57 GMT