W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: The HTTP vs SPDY debate

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:58:06 +0200
Message-ID: <4F745C5E.5040209@gmx.de>
To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
CC: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-03-29 14:44, Karl Dubost wrote:
>
> Le 29 mars 2012 à 08:22, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
>> We could then get to a point where :
>>   - an http:// scheme indicates a connection to HTTP/1.x or 2.x server
>>   - an https:// scheme indicates a connection to HTTP/1.x or 2.x server
>>     via an SSL/TLS layer
>>   - a spdy:// scheme indicates a connection to HTTP/1.x or 2.x server
>>     via a SPDY layer
>
>
> Usually with
>
>      <img src="//example.org/foo.png" alt=""/>
>
> you can create content which is easily interact with http and https
> without headaches (except for IE I think). It creates a nicer transition
 > ...

My understanding was that this works cross-browser (as it should).

Do you have a test case?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 12:58:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:57 GMT