W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

RE: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk@cloudmark.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 04:15:12 +0000
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280BBCC2@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 8:15 PM
> To: Peter Saint-Andre
> Cc: Murray S. Kucherawy; ietf-http-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: draft-kucherawy-httpbis-summary
> 
> Awesome.
> 
> I find the fact that the document is documented by lists entitled "IANA
> Actions include" (capitalization?) to be a little strange, but also
> surprisingly useful.  Being able to see where "X" is defined is a
> useful property.  If you could find a way to label these differently,
> that would be awesome.  Sorry, but I'm not sure that I have a good
> suggestion.

How about "IANA actions in this document"?

I didn't list all the registrations for all the registries because in at least one case the full bulleted list of them would take an entire page.  Instead it's more of a "If you don't find the one you want in the other documents, it's in the first one."  But if you wanted me to be complete, I could.

> On 28 March 2012 01:24, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> > series. In which case this document probably needs to be standards
> > track.
> 
> We should celebrate and embrace our downref rules.

I'm sure you're kidding about that... right?  :-)

I'll switch it to PS.  A missed downref in a Last Call announcement only causes delays.

At last report the WG draft pre-approval tool is busted, but let me know if and when I should rename this to draft-ietf-httpbis-something and resubmit it.

-MSK
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 04:15:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:57 GMT