- From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:38:51 +0000
- To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
- Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>, mnot@mnot.net, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:54:32PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <4F46BFDF.3070703@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes: > > > > 2782 was published 12 years ago this month. I suppose it can be > > considered mature enough to deploy at this point? :) > > +1000 Over in spfbis, people are arguing that the SPF RRTYPE should be deprecated and abandoned in SPF because nobody uses it because of practical difficulties in getting new RRTYPEs deployed. What makes us think that the arguments in favour of SRV are going to find more fertile ground? Best, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
Received on Monday, 27 February 2012 09:37:49 UTC