W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis)

From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 03:57:58 +0000
Message-ID: <4F485C22.90302@dougbarton.us>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
CC: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, mnot@mnot.net, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 02/24/2012 07:38, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:54:32PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> In message <4F46BFDF.3070703@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
>>> 2782 was published 12 years ago this month. I suppose it can be
>>> considered mature enough to deploy at this point? :)
>> +1000
> Over in spfbis, people are arguing that the SPF RRTYPE should be
> deprecated and abandoned in SPF because nobody uses it because of
> practical difficulties in getting new RRTYPEs deployed.  What makes us
> think that the arguments in favour of SRV are going to find more
> fertile ground?

Because I emphasized the point that SRV has been around for 12 years? I
have enough experience to know how difficult it is to deploy new RRs.
SRV is not new.



	It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Received on Monday, 27 February 2012 09:38:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:00 UTC