- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 03:45:44 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
* Julian Reschke wrote: >So it needs a value. We could say > > useUTF8="yes" > >but then there's always the problem of remembering whether the syntax is >"0"/"1", "false"/"true" or "no"/"yes". Well you need to know what the value should be in any case and since we only have one valid value this particular problem does not really arise; one could similarily argue that encoding=utf-8 is confusing because it suggests other encodings can be used, or that it applies to the WWW-Au- thenticate header (like the realm parameter if using non-ascii wasn't deprecated, if I recall correctly). We could meet in the middle and use something like `use=utf-8` or `options="utf-8"`. But whatever, not a big issue. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:46:15 UTC