W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 03:45:44 +0100
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <uj9hi711sohpdljo8tjl8ace5a0uf55eil@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
* Julian Reschke wrote:
>So it needs a value. We could say
>
>   useUTF8="yes"
>
>but then there's always the problem of remembering whether the syntax is 
>"0"/"1", "false"/"true" or "no"/"yes".

Well you need to know what the value should be in any case and since we
only have one valid value this particular problem does not really arise;
one could similarily argue that encoding=utf-8 is confusing because it
suggests other encodings can be used, or that it applies to the WWW-Au-
thenticate header (like the realm parameter if using non-ascii wasn't
deprecated, if I recall correctly). We could meet in the middle and use
something like `use=utf-8` or `options="utf-8"`. But whatever, not a big
issue.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:46:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:54 GMT