W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: paramname in draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:50:24 +0100
To: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v82myadp64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:18:43 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
> So overall, I think it's better to stick to
>    encoding="value"
> and hard-wire the value to "UTF-8". (I'm open to renaming the parameter  
> to "enc" or "charset")

Other than XML, is there a precedent for using "encoding"? Most places use  
"charset" I think (HTTP, CSS, HTML).

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 21:51:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:54 GMT