W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Rechartering HTTPbis

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:40:56 +0000
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7343.1327711256@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <EC463243-A3B0-4E35-BE92-95B35F3DE067@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri
tes:

>> Re HTTP/next: it would be good to collect a list of things we think we =
>should make progress on; not surprisingly, I'd nominate I18N for header =
>field values.
>
>So, that's an interesting question.

I18N in transport headers:  Forget it, it would kill performance if
done right, and do nobody any good if not.

I18N in content headers: Sure, be my guest.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 00:41:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:53 GMT