W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: HTTP status code for "response too large"

From: Jan Algermissen <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:40:43 +0200
Cc: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Andreas Maier <MAIERA@de.ibm.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@pobox.com>, IETF HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Thomas Narten <tnarten@us.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <1478AE47-8CF8-4815-A605-233EBD0F938A@nordsc.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>

On Apr 18, 2012, at 5:32 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> 
> This is a good illustration of How Not To Do It. 507 should have been more generic, focusing on the interface rather than the implementation (as Roy constantly reminds us).
> 

FWIW, I read about 507 the first time just now and I would never have thought it applies to the response. IMHO, the definition seems to actually work quite well.

Jan

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham
> http://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 17:41:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:52:00 GMT