- From: Jan Algermissen <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:40:43 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Andreas Maier <MAIERA@de.ibm.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@pobox.com>, IETF HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Thomas Narten <tnarten@us.ibm.com>
On Apr 18, 2012, at 5:32 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > This is a good illustration of How Not To Do It. 507 should have been more generic, focusing on the interface rather than the implementation (as Roy constantly reminds us). > FWIW, I read about 507 the first time just now and I would never have thought it applies to the response. IMHO, the definition seems to actually work quite well. Jan > > Cheers, > > -- > Mark Nottingham > http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 17:41:32 UTC