W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: HTTP status code for "response too large"

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:48:32 +0200
Message-ID: <4F8EE250.80206@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, Andreas Maier <MAIERA@de.ibm.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@pobox.com>, IETF HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Thomas Narten <tnarten@us.ibm.com>
On 2012-04-18 17:32, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> ...
> This is a good illustration of How Not To Do It. 507 should have been more generic, focusing on the interface rather than the implementation (as Roy constantly reminds us).
> ...

I think the problem is the reverse one; the definition of 507 isn't 
precise enough, leading people to think it's about responses as well 
(and yes, me too).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 15:49:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:02 UTC