W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Ascii-based SPDY "compression" idea

From: Adrien W. de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:56:36 +0000
To: "Brian Pane" <brianp@brianp.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <emd079df34-2f27-4c04-ba53-790d73259398@boist>

------ Original Message ------
From: "Brian Pane" <brianp@brianp.net>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 3/04/2012 5:48:42 a.m.
Subject: Re: Ascii-based SPDY "compression" idea
>On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>
>>
>>In message <CAAbTgTs55FmKP+HOKhNOz-q_SY1cBec7XLpxqruhFN-+TxtieA@mail.gmail.com>
>>, Brian Pane writes:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>In terms of performance, that's a step backwards from SPDY in two ways:
>>>
>>>- An additional round trip is needed to negotiate the use of HTTP/2.0.
>>>
>>
>>
>>You mean that it suffers from being interoperable with HTTP/1.1 ?
>>
>
>
>SPDY also is interoperable with HTTP/1.1 -- it can cleanly SSL-tunnel
>through intermediaries
>
  
for now.
  
> -- without adding that extra round trip.
>
  
  

  
>
>
>-Brian
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 20:57:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:59 GMT