W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Ascii-based SPDY "compression" idea

From: Brian Pane <brianp@brianp.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:48:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAbTgTsvNDFQzVYHNNM-cuD+qWVX+o3QwgLzNk9gZihjSN_csQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> In message <CAAbTgTs55FmKP+HOKhNOz-q_SY1cBec7XLpxqruhFN-+TxtieA@mail.gmail.com>
> , Brian Pane writes:
>
>>In terms of performance, that's a step backwards from SPDY in two ways:
>>
>>- An additional round trip is needed to negotiate the use of HTTP/2.0.
>
> You mean that it suffers from being interoperable with HTTP/1.1 ?

SPDY also is interoperable with HTTP/1.1 -- it can cleanly SSL-tunnel
through intermediaries -- without adding that extra round trip.

-Brian
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 17:49:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:59 GMT