W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: update: http progress notification

From: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 20:00:41 +0200
To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1274896841.7394.11.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
mån 2010-05-24 klockan 13:13 +1200 skrev Adrien de Croy:

> Tests with unmodified Firefox and IE showed no problem with multiple 102 
> responses prior to the final response as well (even though this won't be 
> an issue since the draft proposes the client explicitly advertises support).

Hmm.. is that explicit negotiation really needed?

Checking.. right the specs says "Unexpected 1xx status responses MAY be
ignored by a user agent", not MUST, so sending progress updates MAY
break HTTP/1.1 compliant clients.

The question however is if that perhaps should be a MUST?

Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 18:01:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:53 UTC