W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: [draft-nottingham-http-link-header-06] extension tokens

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:53:27 +0200
Message-ID: <4A6A2D57.8090003@gmx.de>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> Since this is Last Call I thought I should mention that I much prefer the WHATWG wiki approach to extensions over requiring people to use an overly long URI. It both provides people with a short token and provides other people with a clue as to what is happening in the world.
> ...

The draft does not require people to use URIs at all. There's a registry 
for tokens, just like in the HTML5 proposal. The only difference is that 
the registry lives somewhere else, and the registry procedure has 
different requirements.

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 21:54:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:08 GMT