On 20.10.2008, at 22:40, Brian Smith wrote: >> Proposal 1 IMHO breaks the PUT semantics (that's why I started this >> thread). > > Proposal 1 was: "Simply do allow that use case. WebDAV clients > already expect the server to create the resources at the URI they > are given. This is a pretty fundamental part of WebDAV; an extension > of WebDAV that didn't support it isn't an extension at all." > > In other words, just let the client pick the URI like we always have > in WebDAV, and don't attempt to support servers that do not want to > let the client pick the URI. There is nothing that breaks PUT's > semantics there. +1 I actually prefer that over adding some custom POST to CardDAV / xyz. Thanks, Helge -- Helge Hess http://helgehess.eu/Received on Monday, 20 October 2008 22:12:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:56 GMT