W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:27:07 +1000
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <EFAA00E4-A414-41C1-9DD0-39C1152BC2FC@mnot.net>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>

I don't hear anybody arguing strongly that we should be closing this  
extensibility point (although I'm of half a mind to do so myself).

If we keep it, it sounds like we want to just tidy things up, not  
establish a registry.

I'm also thinking noting the relationship to caching and the issues  
associated with format-specific range units may be worth discussing  
when we document how to do this type of extension (see charter).

Cheers,



On 07/08/2008, at 3:40 AM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:

>
>
> On Aug 5, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
>>
>> Playing the devil's advocate: is there *any* range unit other than  
>> "bytes" we can think of that is indeed independent of formats?  
>> Right now, I can't think of any.
>
> CRLF or LF could be used as the defined separators for a "lines"  
> range count.  This wouldn't be useful for all formats, but could be  
> useful for many text and text-based formats or even binary formats  
> that happened to use LF as a line separator.
>
> I know MS software uses "rows" counters for XML-formatted data but  
> as you say that's dependent on a particular format.  I'm not aware  
> of any other implemented range units beyond bytes.
>
> Lisa
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 8 August 2008 07:27:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:54 GMT