Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> I don't hear anybody arguing strongly that we should be closing this 
> extensibility point (although I'm of half a mind to do so myself).

Correct. We should consider this when a proper fix turns out to be too 
expensive.

> If we keep it, it sounds like we want to just tidy things up, not 
> establish a registry.

+1

> ...

BR, Julian