W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:25:07 +1100
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E00E011F-9BAE-4356-B207-7D91121CF8F8@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On 28/02/2008, at 11:26 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> It seems to me it would be unwise to say "clients SHOULD believe the  
> Allow header", but "servers MAY leave of methods".
> If we relax the requirement for the production, we also need to  
> relax the requirement for the recipient.

How about

Clients SHOULD believe the Allow header
Servers SHOULD send a complete Allow header

with weasel words on both sides to clarify that the client may try  
other ones in cases where it has external information / has explicit  
user input, and the servers may leave off methods for security, access  
control, or implementation reasons?

Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2008 23:25:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:44 UTC