- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:35:31 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > > > On 28/02/2008, at 11:26 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> It seems to me it would be unwise to say "clients SHOULD believe the >> Allow header", but "servers MAY leave of methods". >> >> If we relax the requirement for the production, we also need to relax >> the requirement for the recipient. > > > How about > > Clients SHOULD believe the Allow header > Servers SHOULD send a complete Allow header > > with weasel words on both sides to clarify that the client may try other > ones in cases where it has external information / has explicit user > input, and the servers may leave off methods for security, access > control, or implementation reasons? I think that's what we need to say. BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 29 February 2008 10:35:47 UTC