W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:05:38 +1100
Message-Id: <8E523BEF-78F9-4F80-BA2D-79D6BF411FAF@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Looking over the design issues list <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/9 
 >, the following issues look like they can be handled by the editors  
without input from the WG (keeping in mind that we can always correct  
errors after they're in the draft);

* i39 - ETag uniqueness

* i51 - HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date

* i61 - Redirection vs. Location

* i64 - WS in quoted-pair

* i94 - Reason-Phrase BNF

If anyone (especially the editors) has an objection, please say so.

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 01:06:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:46 GMT