W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94

From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 03:41:42 +0200
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <ft1cga$65g$1@ger.gmane.org>

Mark Nottingham wrote:

 <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/10>
> the following issues look like they can be handled by
> the editors without input from the WG
[...]
> * i51 - HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date
[...]
> * i64 - WS in quoted-pair

i51 + i64 look interesting, the latter mentions to use
RFC 2822.  When the editors tackle this I hope they
check 2822upd, there are some subtle ABNF corrections,
and 2822upd is very near to ready (behind PubReq).

 Frank
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 01:40:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:46 GMT