- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:45:45 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
ons 2008-04-02 klockan 14:42 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke: > You mean ... "405 is a more detailed..."? Agreed. Yes. Sorry for the obvious typo. > Which IMHO means we should remove the "SHOULD" level requirement. I claim that it doesn't really matter. SHOULD is a SHOULD (not MUST) and implementers who have trouble implementing a SHOULD for some reason is free to not to as long as they carefully consider the effects of doing so. SHOULD level requirements is there to clarify what common sense is and making sure all implementers have about the same idea of what makes sense. The requirement as such makes sense to be a SHOULD as it does not make a lot sense from a protocol perspective to send requests using methods not included in the set advertised as supported (if a such set is advertised). With the proposed change in language I do not care either way. The client requrement may stay or go as far as I am concerned. Regards Henrik
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 22:46:54 UTC