W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:59:56 -0800
Message-Id: <48C33549-86D7-4A7A-8B0F-B9A3717D84C3@gbiv.com>
Cc: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>

On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:38 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> We've also briefly discussed folding RFC2145 into 2616bis, or at  
> least expanding upon the reference to make it more prominent and  
> give more context.

I am pretty sure that 2145 was already folded into 2616.  Maybe  
was left out, but I see no reason to add more redundant specification.

Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2007 00:00:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:44 UTC