W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE: Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 messages

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:57:57 -0800
Message-Id: <01359830-C8C6-4794-B39C-F95CE8B85501@mnot.net>
Cc: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
To: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>

I often have to point people to 2145, because a) they're not aware of  
it, and b) 2616 doesn't go into much detail about this topic.


On 26/11/2007, at 3:59 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

> On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:38 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
>> We've also briefly discussed folding RFC2145 into 2616bis, or at  
>> least expanding upon the reference to make it more prominent and  
>> give more context.
>
> I am pretty sure that 2145 was already folded into 2616.  Maybe  
> something
> was left out, but I see no reason to add more redundant specification.
>
> ....Roy
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2007 06:58:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:23 GMT