W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:19:41 +0200
Message-ID: <465EBD5D.3090208@gmx.de>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>

Eliot Lear wrote:
> Mark,
>> Considering the scope of 2616bis is errata, and explicitly not new 
>> features/mechanisms, I'm not sure I follow. Do you think that 
>> designing new auth mechanisms will expose new errata?
>> My initial thought is that it's much more likely that it'll require 
>> who new features, or no changes to HTTP at all.
> If you do the errata and then we need any update to cover authentication 
> - whatsoever - we end up with bisbis.  That's my point.

But that would be an update to RCF2617, not RFC2616bis, right?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2007 12:26:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:42 UTC