- From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:18:53 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
Mark, > Considering the scope of 2616bis is errata, and explicitly not new > features/mechanisms, I'm not sure I follow. Do you think that > designing new auth mechanisms will expose new errata? > > My initial thought is that it's much more likely that it'll require > who new features, or no changes to HTTP at all. If you do the errata and then we need any update to cover authentication - whatsoever - we end up with bisbis. That's my point. Eliot
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2007 13:41:37 UTC