W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis

From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:18:53 +0000
Message-ID: <465EBBC7.9030800@cisco.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>

> Considering the scope of 2616bis is errata, and explicitly not new 
> features/mechanisms, I'm not sure I follow. Do you think that 
> designing new auth mechanisms will expose new errata?
> My initial thought is that it's much more likely that it'll require 
> who new features, or no changes to HTTP at all.

If you do the errata and then we need any update to cover authentication 
- whatsoever - we end up with bisbis.  That's my point.

Received on Thursday, 31 May 2007 13:41:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:42 UTC