W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: Etag-on-write, 2nd attempt (== IETF draft 01)

From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:03:36 -0400
Message-ID: <68fba5c50609121703n2e72bab4odac52e1797fa81eb@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@osafoundation.org>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

On 9/12/06, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> a) if deployed clients make that assumption,

Are they making the assumption that the response will be
octet-for-octet identical or semantically identical?

Atom clients wouldn't understand the difference between an entry
submitted in UTF-8 and one returned in UTF-16.


Robert Sayre
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2006 00:03:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:40 UTC