W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: Etag-on-write, 2nd attempt (== IETF draft 01)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:15:08 +0200
Message-ID: <45082E8C.3020101@gmx.de>
To: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
CC: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Robert Sayre schrieb:
> 
> On 9/12/06, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> a) if deployed clients make that assumption,
> 
> Are they making the assumption that the response will be
> octet-for-octet identical or semantically identical?

I guess the former. Let's stay away from the weak etag/semantic 
equivalence thing for now :-).

> Atom clients wouldn't understand the difference between an entry
> submitted in UTF-8 and one returned in UTF-16.

Right, and that's not a problem at all in practice.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2006 16:21:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:46 GMT