Re: Etag-on-write, 2nd attempt (== IETF draft 01)

Robert Sayre schrieb:
> 
> On 9/12/06, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> a) if deployed clients make that assumption,
> 
> Are they making the assumption that the response will be
> octet-for-octet identical or semantically identical?

I guess the former. Let's stay away from the weak etag/semantic 
equivalence thing for now :-).

> Atom clients wouldn't understand the difference between an entry
> submitted in UTF-8 and one returned in UTF-16.

Right, and that's not a problem at all in practice.

Best regards, Julian