On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 02:02:54 +0100, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> wrote: > Nonethless, I suspect the correct fix in _this_ case is to change the > standards to admit that text/xml (with no charset) doesn't force a > us-ascii charset, because that's silly, and if an XML file starts with > an <?xml..?> declaration which specifies the encoding, _that's_ the > encoding of the file. Just like text/html. Absolutely. That makes the most sense, especially since that's how many (most?) XML libraries already behave. Therefore, I think Mark's PaceShouldBeWellFormed[1] is imho a perfect solution. ____ [1] <url: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceShouldBeWellFormed> -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbjornu@hotmail.com «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»Received on Friday, 25 June 2004 01:59:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:22:12 GMT