W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 22:55:54 +0200
Message-ID: <40AE6CDA.5090504@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org

Lisa Dusseault wrote:


>> I can't find the term "static" in RFC2616... It's also not clear how 
>> "generated dynamically" affects the ability to use a specific PATCH 
>> format. Assuming that PATCH will only work for authorable resources 
>> (those you can PUT to), could you please explain which of the set of 
>> these resources you're trying to exclude?
> 
> 
> That's an even better wording -- authorable resources, or those you can 
> PUT to.  Thanks for providing specific wording.

OK. But then this makes it "Servers SHOULD support VCDIFF on all 
resources where PATCH is allowed", right?

Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 21 May 2004 16:56:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:30 GMT