Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt

Heh.  Effectively, yes.


On May 21, 2004, at 1:55 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>
>
>>> I can't find the term "static" in RFC2616... It's also not clear how 
>>> "generated dynamically" affects the ability to use a specific PATCH 
>>> format. Assuming that PATCH will only work for authorable resources 
>>> (those you can PUT to), could you please explain which of the set of 
>>> these resources you're trying to exclude?
>> That's an even better wording -- authorable resources, or those you 
>> can PUT to.  Thanks for providing specific wording.
>
> OK. But then this makes it "Servers SHOULD support VCDIFF on all 
> resources where PATCH is allowed", right?
>
> Julian
>
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760