W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:01:55 -0700
Message-Id: <172A4484-AB6A-11D8-8F35-000A95B2BB72@osafoundation.org>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

Heh.  Effectively, yes.


On May 21, 2004, at 1:55 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>
>
>>> I can't find the term "static" in RFC2616... It's also not clear how 
>>> "generated dynamically" affects the ability to use a specific PATCH 
>>> format. Assuming that PATCH will only work for authorable resources 
>>> (those you can PUT to), could you please explain which of the set of 
>>> these resources you're trying to exclude?
>> That's an even better wording -- authorable resources, or those you 
>> can PUT to.  Thanks for providing specific wording.
>
> OK. But then this makes it "Servers SHOULD support VCDIFF on all 
> resources where PATCH is allowed", right?
>
> Julian
>
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 21 May 2004 17:02:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:30 GMT