In 14.9.3, [...] Many HTTP/1.0 cache implementations will treat an Expires value that is less than or equal to the response Date value as being equivalent to the Cache-Control response directive 'no-cache'. If an HTTP/1.1 cache receives such a response, and the response does not include a Cache-Control header field, it SHOULD consider the response to be non-cacheable in order to retain compatibility with HTTP/1.0 servers. Would it be safe to assume 'non-cacheable' can be interpreted as 'stale' here? (everything else says it is) Mark Nottingham Internet Project Manager Merrill Lynch Australasia (Melbourne)Received on Wednesday, 21 July 1999 06:11:15 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:32 EDT