W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1997

Re: Any objections to "Accept-encoding: gzip, *;q=0"?

From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 09:39:19 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199707220739.JAA05987@wsooti08.win.tue.nl>
To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/3846
Jeffrey Mogul:
>  (a)	Accept-Encoding: gzip, compress, no-identity
>		/* an explicit "no identity-encoding wanted" token */

I like (a) best.  The trouble with adding q values to this header is
that it makes selecting the `best' encoding much more complicated
(decoding short floats and finding the highest one is too complicated
to do in a simple shell script, for example), and this would
discourage the deployment of servers which know about encodings.

I think that the knowledge that `gzip is better than compress is
better than identity' can just as well be implemented at the server
side, and implementing it there will be much cheaper.

Another reason I like (a) is that there won't be any compatibility
problems with existing servers.


Received on Tuesday, 22 July 1997 00:53:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:20 UTC