From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Koen Holtman) Message-Id: <199801221843.TAA24997@wsooti08.win.tue.nl> To: email@example.com (Henrik Frystyk Nielsen) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 19:43:37 +0100 (MET) Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: First reactions to mandatory draft Henrik Frystyk Nielsen: > [...] >This is an unavoidable problem when multiple extensions share a single, >global header field space and no central registry can hinder this. The >alternative is to pass all extension information as parameters: > > M-GET / HTTP/1.1 > Host: foobar > Man: "http://screwball.org/skidoo.html"; Skidoo=abc, > "http://nutcase.org/skidoo.html"; Skidoo=def > >which avoids the problem altogether. I highly prefer this alternative of passing all extension info as parameters in the Man header. Dynamically allocating collision-free headers is so difficult that is is not worth the trouble (see my comments on an earlier PEP draft for a discussion). Why add a complicated indirection layer if you do not need one? If people really want headers, the draft can tell them to register them in the upcoming IANA header registry. >Henrik Koen.