W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > March 1999

RE: need a reviewer (or three) for draft-cai-ssdp-v1-00.txt

From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 20:03:06 -0800
Message-ID: <3FF8121C9B6DD111812100805F31FC0D08792FF3@RED-MSG-59>
To: "'Keith Moore'" <moore@cs.utk.edu>, web@apps.ietf.org
Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org
Do be kind, it is a version 0. There are some pretty egregious mistakes in
the draft (the misuse of the request-URI and Location header come to mind)
which have been fixed in a V1, which will be released after the draft
lock-out. The v0 draft should be seen as an indication of a general
direction.

As for layering, why do you believe this is a layering on top of HTTP? The
draft expands HTTP in a direction that others, such as SIP, have already
gone. SIP already defines how to send SIP requests over unicast UDP and
multicast UDP. The only thing even mildly original about the spec is the
ANNOUNCE method which I suspect you can find strong parallels for in SIP.
ANNOUNCE is a fairly natural method to have once you have multicast support.

This spec seems more a natural progression than a layering.

	Then again, I'm obviously biased. =)

			Yaron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore@cs.utk.edu]
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 1999 10:19 AM
> To: web@apps.ietf.org
> Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org
> Subject: need a reviewer (or three) for draft-cai-ssdp-v1-00.txt
> 
> 
> one of the other ADs ran across this draft, which layers a protocol
> on top of HTTP.  we're looking for a few good HTTP experts to
> sanity check this draft, paying special attention to the proposed
> methods and usage - and perhaps to show up at a BOF in Minneapolis
> and comment on the draft.
> 
> if you're willing to look at this before Minneapolis, please 
> send me a note.
> 
> Keith
> 
> p.s. I haven't read it yet myself...
> 
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 1999 23:04:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:38:00 UTC