W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > February 1999

Re: APPLCORE rough concensus?

From: Graham Klyne <GK@dial.pipex.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 12:48:38 +0000
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19990209104907.006927e8@pop.dial.pipex.com>
To: <spreitze@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org
At 08:04 08/02/99 PST, spreitze@parc.xerox.com wrote:
>
>I wonder exactly what "should be coordinated with the HTTP-NG team and
ONCRPC WG" means.  Does it mean that harmony with the HTTP-NG and/or ONCRPC
protocols is a requirement?  Does it mean that harmony with the HTTP-NG
and/or ONCRPC protocols counts for something when making design choices?


What *I* would mean is that I see some overlap between the goals of
APPLCORE and HTTP-NG (and some overlap between HTTP-NG and ONC RPC goals),
and that if one solution serves both that would be better than two solutions.

E.g. see my separate comments on handling concurrency.

#g

------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 1999 07:48:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:59 UTC