W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Re (4): collection version resources

From: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:15:25 +0000
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <802569D6.0032DA6B.00@d06mta07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>

I agree with Greg that simpler uses of workspace are feasible.


Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> on 2001-01-16 05:42:04 AM

Please respond to Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>

To:   ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject:  Re: Re (4): collection version resources

On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 08:01:11PM -0500, Geoffrey M. Clemm wrote:
> But this does raise a good point wrt the "workspace option".  Workspaces
> are designed so that "baselining" and "merging" would be unambiguous.
> Which means that there is not much point implementing workspaces if
> you are not implementing baselining or merging.
> I'm tempted to suggest that we define the workspace option as implying
> support for both the "baseline option" and the "merge option".  Does
> anyone object?

I could create a workspace, populate it, checkout a resource, modify it,
then check it back in. Maybe hop over to the "public" VCR and update it.

Who says that I need baselines or merging? So, I'd say "I object" until
there appears to be a good reason for requiring one or the other.


Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2001 04:16:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:46 UTC