RE: ISO 8859-6 (was: ISO 8859-11 Latin/Thai + Euro)

Otto Stolz wrote:

> Markus Kuhn had written:
> > I suspect they are the same and that [ISO 8859-11] will be
> > the first part of ISO 8859 that has combining characters.
> 
> Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> > No, the first was ISO 8859-6. Sorry to disappoint ;)
> 
[...]
> 
> The issue of combining characters is not mentioned in
> ISO 8859-6. Do you think, it is implicit in the character
> names? And if so, which characters are combining, in your
> opinion?

I think that Roozbeh had these ISO 8859-6 characters in mind:

	0xEB    ARABIC FATHATAN
	0xEC    ARABIC DAMMATAN
	0xED    ARABIC KASRATAN
	0xEE    ARABIC FATHA
	0xEF    ARABIC DAMMA
	0xF0    ARABIC KASRA
	0xF1    ARABIC SHADDA
	0xF2    ARABIC SUKUN

These *are* combining characters, or am I loosing something?

_ Marco