- From: Marco Cimarosti <marco.cimarosti@essetre.it>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 17:04:34 +0100
- To: "'Otto Stolz'" <Otto.Stolz@uni-konstanz.de>, Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh@sharif.edu>
- Cc: Markus Kuhn <Markus.Kuhn@cl.cam.ac.uk>, ietf-charsets <ietf-charsets@iana.org>, unicode <unicode@unicode.org>, i18n <i18n@XFree86.Org>, li18nux <li18nux@li18nux.org>
Otto Stolz wrote: > Markus Kuhn had written: > > I suspect they are the same and that [ISO 8859-11] will be > > the first part of ISO 8859 that has combining characters. > > Roozbeh Pournader wrote: > > No, the first was ISO 8859-6. Sorry to disappoint ;) > [...] > > The issue of combining characters is not mentioned in > ISO 8859-6. Do you think, it is implicit in the character > names? And if so, which characters are combining, in your > opinion? I think that Roozbeh had these ISO 8859-6 characters in mind: 0xEB ARABIC FATHATAN 0xEC ARABIC DAMMATAN 0xED ARABIC KASRATAN 0xEE ARABIC FATHA 0xEF ARABIC DAMMA 0xF0 ARABIC KASRA 0xF1 ARABIC SHADDA 0xF2 ARABIC SUKUN These *are* combining characters, or am I loosing something? _ Marco
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2002 20:31:17 UTC